I share two unsolicted and probably wrong opinions
And how much are RCMP body cameras gonna cost the city? We'll find out... sometime!
I’m starting today’s newsletter with two opinions I want to share. I am not convinced I am right but I am going to say them anyways.
The UNBC entrance of University Way should be converted to a roundabout.
You do not need to have your headlamp on when you are walking in the winter.
These are unrelated.
On the UNBC one, I mean the point where you turn off the main road onto campus. The amount of traffic there has really increased, so anyone who is trying to turn across traffic can be waiting a while. As far as I can tell, there’s room there for a roundabout and the city already made that great video teaching people how to use one, so really, this should just happen.
As for the headlamps, I am not sure when it happened but sometime in the last decade everyone lost their night vision, it seems. One of the things about snow is that it reflects streetlights and moonlight and such and makes things bright, or bright enough, even when it’s dark out. You can be out at 10 p.m. (and definitely at 5 p.m.!) and have full vision. It’s magical. But not if you are using a headlamp! And especially not if everyone else is, too! I feel like the headlamp thing is just the pedestrian version of headlights arm race. By all means take one with you, and use them for visibility when you’re on streets, but if you’re in fields or walking trails in residential neighbourhoods, try letting your eyes adjust. I know many/most people will feel differently about this, and tell me why I’m wrong, and I will not have good answers, and I know it will have no impact, I’m just putting it out in the world as a person who likes to experience the dark-but-not-actually-dark of winter sometimes.
Capital projects are on budget, mostly
I got an email from someone pointing out that when the city puts out a Facebook post about bears or garbage cans or snow removal they get dozens of comments and interactions but if they put somthing out about how the city is spending literally millions of dollars it’s crickets. And - they are right: here’s the post on the capital budget report as it is right now:
The report is here. I will say, there are a lot more projects worth more than $1 million than I would have expected, though probably should have. Some are behind schedule. Most are on time and on budget. I do get it’s not that exciting, and is a sign that the city is doing its job and functioning as expected — but that hasn’t always been the case for all projects (**coughcoughcoughparkadecoughcough**) and these reports are a direct result of the calls for more transparency after those so — let’s acknowledge them!
What are the RCMP body cameras going to cost the city?
The RCMP rolled out more details of the body camera project, which Prince George police will be piloting along with a handful of other communities across the country. One number that came out was cost — $3,000 per user per year. That’s the cost of both the tech itself and the cost of storing/processing/transcribing the data that’s collected by them. The feds are kicking in $5 million annually over the next six years to fund the program which is, I guess, a lot but also that’s the whole country. $5 million divided by $3,000 is 1,666 user pers year funded by the feds. The number of cameras being distributed in B.C. to start is 300. I don’t know how many users each camera will have, but let’s say it’s two peeople, that takes us to 600 users per year, which is about 1/3 of the total money the federal government is kicking in for this project nationwide. So the cost, initially, could be nothing, or it could be something, and it’s still, as far as I can tell, not really clear. The city pays 90 per cent of the RCMP budget locally so this could really be a very small cost or a somewhat large one. Probably not as big as the $5 million the city is already paying because of delayed negotiations between the feds and the police union, but when that’s already there, it might be a bit of a pain when it finally does get the bill at the end of the fiscal year. I guess we’ll see.
Urban archipelagos
This really isn’t about Prince George at all but it does fit with the theme of a few recent newsletters, particularly the one focused on UNBC’s Rylan Graham’s presentation on the desire young people have to live in urban areas and the lack of options available to make that happen in Prince George and my sharing of Darrin Rigo’s newsletter yesterday where he made another case for urbanism as a tenant of city planing.
I came across a converation between David Roberts and Dan Savage revisiting a piece Savage had written 20 years ago and was refocusing on in the present context arguing that in the United States the political map is not best understood as “red states” and “blue states” but rather urban islands and archipelagos as the base for the Democratic Party. And part of what he argues is that rather than try to appeal to “rural” values the party should focus on making cities better, so more people want to live there and exurban or suburban areas want to be more like them, thus creating more islands.
A lot of it is about the politics of the United States but the part I’m most interested in is the idea of identity — and how people embrace “rural” as a connective tissue and identity in a way that “urban” is not, and there seem to be very few people in positions of leadership who will really champion city living in the same way there are peope who champion rural living.
This does, I think, vageuly tie into the way we think about ourselves — a theme I’ve come back to again and again, in that we (Prince George) self-identity as a resource town when the reality is we’re as much, if not moreso, an education, healthcare and service centre. But again, you won’t really here that come out of the mouths of leadership all that often, especially at a provincial or federal level. This is all sort of vague, putting-it-out-there stuff that I’m mulling over in public, no big conclusions. But there it is for you. Here’s that initial link again.
News roundup:
Six people sent to hospital following two vehicle crash north of Hixon.
Prince George Fire Rescue plans to convert pickup truck to medical unit. Medical calls rarely detain Prince George firefighters from responding to fires.
Community rallies around two-year-old diagnosed with cancer.
Jail time for repeat impaired driver in Prince George court.
In-person services in Northern BC continue to remain sparse: Canadian Mental Health Association.
Foundry gets boost for youth mental health services from Prince George Ford.
Operation Red Nose returning for the holidays keeping roads safe.
College Heights embracing underdog role in Provincial Football Semifinal.
City councillor, Ginter’s advocacy group says possible Foothills Boulevard extension a bad idea.
Theatre Northwest brings hit Kim's Convenience to the local stage.
New exhibition takes us along a scenic and self-healing journey.
Prince George teacher's Team Canada wins ultimate championship.
Northern Capital News is a free, daily newsletter about life in Prince George. Please consider subscribing or, if you have, sharing with someone else.
Send feedback by emailing northerncapitalnews@gmail.com. Find me online at akurjata.ca.
Outstanding edition Andrew. On your provocative points #1, also would love to see more traffic circles as the evidence shows they are safer and more cost effective, and from my daily experience with the Cameron Street bridge circle we’re getting good (and comfortable)using them. I get that there will be emotional backlash but if I was king, I’d tell those folks to park their pathos (feelings) and put their faith in logic, reason, and science (logos).
On your provocative point #2. I’m with you. Dancing in the dark, or under moonlight is sublime for me. I especially enjoy traditional cross-country skiing in non-lit areas and feeling the tracks without seeing them, a magical sensation.
Unfortunately, not everyone is wired to appreciate such sensory deprived shenanigans. Some folks appreciate the convenience of seeing, instead of feeling, where they are going and then there are those safety freaks, you know who you are. This often leads me to night recreate all by my lonesome when I want to be in bliss.
Maybe us enlightened, yet non lit folks can unite for lightless adventuring. Procuring a taser or two, to neutralize the closet clandestine torchbearers that might stumble upon our midst would be an early order of business.
Not wrong. As a frequent very early morning pedestrian I will use a flashlight at times: when I need to see what my dog is snuffling at, when I need to clean up after him, and when I am running alongside a greenspace. Otherwise, my reflective gear makes me pretty visible to traffic. And I know how blinding it can be to have a car's headlights coming at you.